thurstond wrote:
> This will be fixed here: #134560
Thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mizvekov wrote:
This will be fixed here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134560
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
thurstond wrote:
If it is not quick and easy to fix forward, please consider reverting in the
meantime, so that the buildbots can be green and provide useful feedback to
contributors. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132748
___
cfe-c
thurstond wrote:
> @thurstond Well can you provide a more recent buildbot failure link where
> #130182 is not on the list of possible culpirits? Because the link @fmayer
> provided for sure included it.
@mizvekov I localized the MSan error to this patch by re-running the buildbot
script with
mizvekov wrote:
@thurstond Well can you provide a more recent buildbot failure link where
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130182 is not on the list of possible
culpirits? Because the link @fmayer provided for sure included it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132748
thurstond wrote:
> @fmayer this patch touches nowhere near where those backtraces indicate.
> #130182 is a far more likely culprit.
#130182 cannot be the cause of the ongoing MSan buildbot failures, because it
was already reverted two days ago in #134239
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/
mizvekov wrote:
@fmayer this patch touches nowhere near where those backtraces indicate.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130182 is a far more likely culprit.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
@@ -1302,6 +1302,8 @@ void TextNodeDumper::dumpBareTemplateName(TemplateName
TN) {
OS << " index " << STS->getIndex();
if (std::optional PackIndex = STS->getPackIndex())
OS << " pack_index " << *PackIndex;
+if (STS->getFinal())
+ OS << " final";
fmayer wrote:
Looks like this CL broke the MSAN bot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/10068
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
jvoung wrote:
> @ymand @jvoung I'd like to know if you tried this patch within google and
> within your tooling, and if you can report whether it is suited and if there
> is any noteworthy performance impact.
Ok, I tried some experiments. Our nullability analysis tests do now pass
without the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime-2` running on `rocm-worker-hw-02` while building
`clang` at step 5 "compile-openmp".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/10/builds/2721
Here is the relevant
https://github.com/mizvekov closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132748
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132748
>From b50ea7d744280bdfb97f0abaeb10d088d502e81a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 16:03:04 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang] Track final substitution for
SubstTemplateTempla
13 matches
Mail list logo
