Rajveer100 wrote:
@shafik
Could you let me know if there are any more changes that are needed here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
https://github.com/Rajveer100 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
>From 864bd0ef7b6bbb0bc1502ef5884ae3c261d3b156 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajveer
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 18:37:17 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Fix a crash in debug mode
Resolves Issue #35603
This bug w
Rajveer100 wrote:
@cor3ntin
Could you help me in closing this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Rajveer100 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
>From 1923c212515033dbb92f09c6d11cd2b679261459 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajveer
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 18:37:17 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Fix a crash in debug mode
Resolves Issue #35603
This bug w
xgupta wrote:
> @cor3ntin Could you describe the format of the `release note` briefly so I
> can `amend` my `commit` accordingly?
Like this -
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74553/files#diff-ec770381d76c859f5f572db789175fe44410a72608f58ad5dbb14335ba56eb97
You also need to clang-forma
Rajveer100 wrote:
@cor3ntin
Could you describe the format of the `release note` briefly so I can `amend` my
`commit` accordingly?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
https://github.com/Rajveer100 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
LGTM too. Please add a release note though
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Rajveer100 wrote:
Why are `clang-format` changes showing up for changes not committed by me?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 4f5d463505b3e313cd3943132e7b2784a65c39d9
efea75d1ae4a1da80b16b3e743a15a82b5f8d971 --
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 %s -verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++23 %s -verify
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+struct A {};
+using CA = const A;
+
+struct S1 : CA {
Rajveer100 wrote:
In the `godbolt` links, the c
https://github.com/Rajveer100 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
>From efea75d1ae4a1da80b16b3e743a15a82b5f8d971 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajveer
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 18:37:17 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Fix a crash in debug mode
Resolves Issue #35603
This bug w
@@ -6431,7 +6431,7 @@ static bool HandleConstructorCall(const Expr *E, const
LValue &This,
// Non-virtual base classes are initialized in the order in the class
// definition. We have already checked for virtual base classes.
assert(!BaseIt->isVirtual() && "v
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 %s -verify
shafik wrote:
Normally if we add a new test just for a specific bug report we name it
something like `GH35603.cpp` so we can readily identify the test is linked to
github issue 35603. If w
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 %s -verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++23 %s -verify
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+struct A {};
+using CA = const A;
+
+struct S1 : CA {
shafik wrote:
These examples: https://godbolt.o
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Rajveer Singh Bharadwaj (Rajveer100)
Changes
Resolves Issue #35603
This change makes the `assertion` less strict in `debug` builds by stripping
qualifiers from the base class and ignoring them. I hope `weakened` assertions
don't affect o
https://github.com/Rajveer100 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
Resolves Issue #35603
This change makes the `assertion` less strict in `debug` builds by stripping
qualifiers from the base class and ignoring them. I hope `weakened` assertions
don't affect other cases wher
17 matches
Mail list logo