Ericson2314 wrote:
This is a very simple thing. I am quite sure it is fine from an LLVM
perspective; I wanted to make sure it was fine from a BSD perspective, and
@epsilon-0 confirmed it (thank you!). Will thus merge shortly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92183
epsilon-0 wrote:
Looks good - ai...@openbsd.org
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92183
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Ericson2314 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92183
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: John Ericson (Ericson2314)
Changes
If the `/usr/lib/...` path one expects is not that, fall back to the regular
logic.
This is a minimal change to allow OpenBSD cross compilation from a toolchain
that doesn't adopt all of OpenBSD's monor
https://github.com/Ericson2314 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92183
If the `/usr/lib/...` path one expects is not that, fall back to the regular
logic.
This is a minimal change to allow OpenBSD cross compilation from a toolchain
that doesn't adopt all of OpenBSD's monorepo'
