https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118601
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118601
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/svenvh commented:
LGTM, but I'm not an expert in this area so I'll leave the formal approval to
someone else.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118601
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
https://github.com/tbaederr updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118601
>From a929550c4b36001c0c6e2b119fc97ba4e31aa50a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 08:37:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][bytecode] Not all null pointers are 0
G
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -no-enable-noundef-analysis %s -cl-std=CL2.0 -include
opencl-c.h -triple amdgcn -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
tbaederr wrote:
Ah, nice. Thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118601
___
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -no-enable-noundef-analysis %s -cl-std=CL2.0 -include
opencl-c.h -triple amdgcn -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
svenvh wrote:
I don't think you need the `-include opencl-c.h` for this test? (it's rather
big, so slows down tes