https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rjmccall wrote:
I agree that blocks don't belong in the ObjC segment.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97172
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
While I think these changes are defensible, I think I would prefer to *not*
move all of the blocks logic into SemaObjC, but I'd love to hear if @rjmccall
agrees with my rationale and conclusion.
Blocks are largely an Objective-C feature, so putting th
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
This patch continues the effort to split `Sema` up, moving more function to
`SemaObjC`. Additional context can be found in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184 and
https://github.com/llvm/l
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97172
This patch continues the effort to split `Sema` up, moving more function to
`SemaObjC`. Additional context can be found in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84184 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-projec
