Szelethus wrote:
Yes, it is, sorry about that :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94357
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
steakhal wrote:
Is this NFC?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94357
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 703e83611cd8bb7174ae76ba2e301f5a5e88b905
b6beb7098bb8e5148fe0467dc976506ff6691f15 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Kristóf Umann (Szelethus)
Changes
In preparation for adding essentially the same visitor to StreamChecker, this
patch factors this visitor out to a common header.
I'll be the first to admit that the interface of these classes are not
ter
https://github.com/Szelethus created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94357
In preparation for adding essentially the same visitor to StreamChecker, this
patch factors this visitor out to a common header.
I'll be the first to admit that the interface of these classes are not
terrific
