jianghc724 wrote:
should be cvts_biasph_hf8 :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/phoebewang edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/e-kud approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
phoebewang wrote:
> should be cvts_biasph_hf8 :)
Good catch! Proves moving the s ahead is wisdom :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
phoebewang wrote:
> > > > Went through the patch with my eyes, I'm not sure how useful it was but
> > > > wasn't able to spot anything.
> > > > > Here is GCC patch:
> > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/678227.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I haven't found any changes r
Rejur wrote:
> > > Went through the patch with my eyes, I'm not sure how useful it was but
> > > wasn't able to spot anything.
> > > > Here is GCC patch:
> > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/678227.html
> > >
> > >
> > > I haven't found any changes regarding `vcvt2ph2`
jianghc724 wrote:
> > Went through the patch with my eyes, I'm not sure how useful it was but
> > wasn't able to spot anything.
> > > Here is GCC patch:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/678227.html
> >
> >
> > I haven't found any changes regarding `vcvt2ph2` and no o
phoebewang wrote:
> Went through the patch with my eyes, I'm not sure how useful it was but
> wasn't able to spot anything.
>
> > Here is GCC patch:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/678227.html
>
> I haven't found any changes regarding `vcvt2ph2` and no other similar
phoebewang wrote:
Here is GCC patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-March/678227.html
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
https://github.com/phoebewang ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Phoebe Wang (phoebewang)
Changes
- Add '_' after cvt[t]s intrinsics when 's' is for saturation;
- Add 's_' for all ipcvt[t] intrinsics since they are all saturation ones;
This is to solve potential confusion since 's' before a type usually
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Phoebe Wang (phoebewang)
Changes
- Add '_' after cvt[t]s intrinsics when 's' is for saturation;
- Add 's_' for all ipcvt[t] intrinsics since they are all saturation ones;
This is to solve potential confusion since 's' before a type u
12 matches
Mail list logo