hvdijk wrote:
The rebase apparently conflicted with #95224. In the test I added, I checked
that I preserved the existing behaviour with `-target-feature -neon`, but that
behaviour has since changed. Updated to remove that bit of the test.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94229
___
https://github.com/hvdijk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94229
>From b1a53997e9378954da353ea1f0d8f03a8f19736f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald van Dijk
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 13:19:56 +
Subject: [PATCH] [SYCL] Allow neon attributes for ARM host
We permit neon attrib
hvdijk wrote:
Rebased to address a conflict with changes that have gone in since I first
submitted this, the PR remains otherwise identical and waiting to be reviewed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
https://github.com/hvdijk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94229
>From 481f6c53379abb4b7240f25b55fb90b54b9454c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald van Dijk
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 15:03:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [SYCL] Allow neon attributes for ARM host
We permit neon attribu
https://github.com/hvdijk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94229
>From 895f71d5f890a3988014e0d779586b9f142be90f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald van Dijk
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 15:03:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [SYCL] Allow neon attributes for ARM host
We permit neon attribu
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Harald van Dijk (hvdijk)
Changes
We permit neon attributes in CUDA device code, but this permission was only for
CUDA device code. The same permission makes sense for SYCL device code as well,
especially now that neon attributes are used
https://github.com/hvdijk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94229
We permit neon attributes in CUDA device code, but this permission was only for
CUDA device code. The same permission makes sense for SYCL device code as well,
especially now that neon attributes are used in glib