https://github.com/yetingk closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91324
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Yeting Kuo (yetingk)
Changes
PR #89727 added the two test cases to verify `.option arch` should only
work when having -menable-experimental-extensions. And the test idea could be
splitted to
1. When having menable-experimental-ex
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Yeting Kuo (yetingk)
Changes
PR #89727 added the two test cases to verify `.option arch` should only
work when having -menable-experimental-extensions. And the test idea could be
splitted to
1. When having menable-experimental-extensions,
https://github.com/yetingk created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91324
PR #89727 added the two test cases to verify `.option arch` should only work
when having -menable-experimental-extensions. And the test idea could be
splitted to
1. When having menable-experimental-extensions, c
