llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-gcc-ubuntu-no-asserts` running on `doug-worker-6` while
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/202/builds/1330
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x64-windows-msvc`
running on `windows-gcebot2` while building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/63/builds/6387
Here is the relevant piece of the build
https://github.com/erichkeane closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140586
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bcardosolopes approved this pull request.
Great, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140586
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/andykaylor approved this pull request.
This seems reasonable to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140586
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: Erich Keane (erichkeane)
Changes
Having the whole clause emission be in a header file ended up being pragmatic,
but ended up being a sizable negative for a variety of reasons. This patch
moves it to its own .cpp file and makes CIRGenFu
https://github.com/erichkeane created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140586
Having the whole clause emission be in a header file ended up being pragmatic,
but ended up being a sizable negative for a variety of reasons. This patch
moves it to its own .cpp file and makes CIRGenFuncti
