llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/24/builds/7603
Here is the releva
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot9`
while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/85/builds/7901
Here is the relev
spall wrote:
> Hi, this turned a few bots red. Can this be fixed forward or should we revert
> in the meantime? Let me know if you need help with the bot setup / build
> config. Thanks!
It can be reverted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
___
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-hwasan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot11`
while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/55/builds/10195
Here is the re
jplehr wrote:
Hi, this turned a few bots red.
Can this be fixed forward or should we revert in the meantime?
Let me know if you need help with the bot setup / build config. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
___
cfe-commits mailin
https://github.com/spall closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/25265
Here is the r
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/23949
Here is the rel
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/29445
Here is
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/13451
Here is the relevant
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/18685
Here is th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-amdgpu-runtime-2` running on `rocm-worker-hw-02` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/10/builds/3846
Here is the re
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `lldb-aarch64-ubuntu`
running on `linaro-lldb-aarch64-ubuntu` while building `clang` at step 6 "test".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/16372
Here is the relevant piece of the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-sles-build-only` running on `rocm-worker-hw-04-sles` while
building `clang` at step 6 "Add check check-clang".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/140/builds/21637
Here is
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/23242
https://github.com/spall updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
>From 5d81a4b7b034dd5999feb6ab37537270d6bae2a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sarah Spall
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 12:04:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] compare unqualified canonical types and add an hlsl array
rvalue
@@ -2268,17 +2268,15 @@ static bool IsStandardConversion(Sema &S, Expr* From,
QualType ToType,
// handling here.
if (ToType->isArrayParameterType()) {
FromType = S.Context.getArrayParameterType(FromType);
- SCS.First = ICK_HLSL_Array_RValue;
} else if (
https://github.com/bogner approved this pull request.
The fact that we get memcpy here points out some of the issues we have with
representing cbuffers - it would really be nicer if this ended up generating
elementwise copies instead. However, I think fixing that is out of the scope of
this ch
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2268,17 +2268,15 @@ static bool IsStandardConversion(Sema &S, Expr* From,
QualType ToType,
// handling here.
if (ToType->isArrayParameterType()) {
FromType = S.Context.getArrayParameterType(FromType);
- SCS.First = ICK_HLSL_Array_RValue;
} else if (
https://github.com/inbelic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/inbelic approved this pull request.
LGTM, just two small things
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/inbelic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2268,17 +2268,15 @@ static bool IsStandardConversion(Sema &S, Expr* From,
QualType ToType,
// handling here.
if (ToType->isArrayParameterType()) {
FromType = S.Context.getArrayParameterType(FromType);
- SCS.First = ICK_HLSL_Array_RValue;
} else if (
https://github.com/spall updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
>From 5d81a4b7b034dd5999feb6ab37537270d6bae2a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sarah Spall
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 12:04:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] compare unqualified canonical types and add an hlsl array
rvalue cas
https://github.com/spall ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp --
clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp clang/lib/Sema/SemaOve
https://github.com/spall created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134174
Update Sema Checking to always do an HLSL Array RValue cast in the case we are
dealing with hlsl constant array types
Instead of comparing canonical types, compare canonical unqualified types
Add a test to show it
28 matches
Mail list logo
