https://github.com/martinboehme approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112457
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/fmayer closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112457
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
martinboehme wrote:
> > I think this is the right change.
> > What I don't understand, though, is why you were getting an assert failure
> > before. (Which line is the assertion on that failed?) I would have thought
> > if you don't dump the nested record, you just get less information.
> > Ap
fmayer wrote:
> I think this is the right change.
>
> What I don't understand, though, is why you were getting an assert failure
> before. (Which line is the assertion on that failed?) I would have thought if
> you don't dump the nested record, you just get less information. Apparently
> not
martinboehme wrote:
I think this is the right change.
What I don't understand, though, is why you were getting an assert failure
before. (Which line is the assertion on that failed?) I would have thought if
you don't dump the nested record, you just get less information. Apparently not
so?
>
fmayer wrote:
> I would suggest a brief comment explaining the choice not to filter.
I'm not sure I understand. There wasn't a choice to filter before, there was
just the (incorrect) assumption that we don't have nested
`RecordStorageLocation`, leading to a crash.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
I would suggest a brief comment explaining the choice not to filter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112457
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cg
fmayer wrote:
An example dump that is now possible but crashed before

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112457
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@l
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Florian Mayer (fmayer)
Changes
We have an internal analysis that uses them, and the HTML dump would
fail on the assertion.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112457.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/An
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: Florian Mayer (fmayer)
Changes
We have an internal analysis that uses them, and the HTML dump would
fail on the assertion.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112457.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) cla
https://github.com/fmayer created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112457
We have an internal analysis that uses them, and the HTML dump would
fail on the assertion.
>From 4264fe1dfed3fc54f339ad4a769d76158c5ee7d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Mayer
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:
11 matches
Mail list logo