pogo59 wrote:
> Do we know the users of *-windows-itanium triples?
I think @bd1976bris might have been using that triple for testing the
dllimport/visibility intersection. I've lost track and don't know what state
that's in now, and whether the triple is still used by us.
https://github.com/l
compnerd wrote:
I don't see why removing the help text is not sufficient to handle the issue?
Even if no major players are using it, I think that there are people using it.
It is a fairly self-contained bit of support.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84121
___
MaskRay wrote:
> > Facebook was using it at one point (can't say if they are currently), I
> > know that Sony had some interested users as well.
> > Yes, the order matters - that was the reason that the flag was implemented
> > in the first place.
>
> Cc @smeenai @pogo59 on whether this option
MaskRay wrote:
> Facebook was using it at one point (can't say if they are currently), I know
> that Sony had some interested users as well.
>
> Yes, the order matters - that was the reason that the flag was implemented in
> the first place.
Cc @smeenai @pogo59 on whether this option is used.
compnerd wrote:
Perhaps the better approach here is to either indicate that it is only
supported on a particular target or to drop the help information rather than
removing the feature.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84121
___
cfe-commits
compnerd wrote:
Facebook was using it at one point (can't say if they are currently), I know
that Sony had some interested users as well.
Yes, the order matters - that was the reason that the flag was implemented in
the first place.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84121
MaskRay wrote:
@compnerd
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84121
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MaskRay wrote:
> I'm not so sure that it is that simple. `-idirafter` and `-isystem-after`
> have slightly different semantics. They impact ordering and warning
> suppression. If there are alternative flags that can be used to control
> those, that might be reasonable.
Do we know the users o
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Fangrui Song (MaskRay)
Changes
Commit 88879e6559a3ae8593e32568900707b1dbf3f060 added -isystem-after
(not in GCC) for CrossWindows (see
543a78b55ee993c2977fc2984f278f7ec0125765; *-windows-itanium).
I have he
https://github.com/MaskRay created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84121
Commit 88879e6559a3ae8593e32568900707b1dbf3f060 added -isystem-after
(not in GCC) for CrossWindows (see
543a78b55ee993c2977fc2984f278f7ec0125765; *-windows-itanium).
I have heard two reports that the documented op
10 matches
Mail list logo
