jmorse wrote:
@huangjd Thanks for the fix -- FYI it's acceptable to commit patches like this
without review (and leave a comment on the original PR) if you wanted to. Given
that it's just the format of the test changing, not any of the meaning, it's an
"obvious" fix.
https://github.com/llvm/l
https://github.com/jayfoad closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95637
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jayfoad wrote:
I'll merge to fix the build.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95637
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jmorse approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95637
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: William Junda Huang (huangjd)
Changes
Fix test case in #95298 because another recent submitted patch removed
llvm.dbg intrinsics, updated test case accordingly
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95637.diff
1 Files
https://github.com/huangjd created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95637
Fix test case in #95298 because another recent submitted patch removed llvm.dbg
intrinsics, updated test case accordingly
>From 5fafbda01e5bf10b898f71b38305485e57e5b13f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: William Hua
