[clang] [CodeGen] Add TBAA struct path info for array members (PR #137719)

brunodf-snps wrote: > I'm surprised we need all this. Since we don't distinguish arrays from their > elements in TBAA, is it not sufficient to just make sure that array subscript > expressions produce an l-value with the same TBAA metadata as their base > l-value? The code is written after [t

[clang] [CodeGen] Add TBAA struct path info for array members (PR #137719)

https://github.com/brunodf-snps updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137719 >From d63c8fe4fcc8e89933bf3c1cc176941b0b9094fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruno De Fraine Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:12:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][CodeGen] Make tbaa-array test more robust Av

[clang] [CodeGen] Add TBAA struct path info for array members (PR #137719)

https://github.com/rjmccall commented: I'm surprised we need all this. Since we don't distinguish arrays from their elements in TBAA, is it not sufficient to just make sure that array subscript expressions produce an l-value with the same TBAA metadata as their base l-value? https://github.co

[clang] [CodeGen] Add TBAA struct path info for array members (PR #137719)

brunodf-snps wrote: > @kosarev @fhahn @rjmccall @efriedma-quic @hfinkel Ping. @AaronBallman @nikic any idea who else could review TBAA changes? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137719 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org h