https://github.com/bogner approved this pull request.
This looks sensible to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133619
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133619
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-sharedlibs`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-sharedlibs` while building `clang` at step 4
"cmake-configure".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/80/builds/12049
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `polly-x86_64-linux-shared`
running on `polly-x86_64-gce2` while building `clang` at step 4
"cmake-configure".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/97/builds/5787
Here is the relevant piece
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast` running on `sanitizer-buildbot4` while building
`clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/9995
Here is the relevant piece o
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`polly-x86_64-linux-shared-plugin` running on `polly-x86_64-gce2` while
building `clang` at step 4 "cmake-configure".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/118/builds/5516
Here is the releva
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-aarch64-latest-gcc`
running on `linaro-flang-aarch64-latest-gcc` while building `clang` at step 4
"cmake-configure".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/130/builds/11827
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-3` while building `clang` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/8943
Here is the r
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`amdgpu-offload-rhel-8-cmake-build-only` running on `rocm-docker-rhel-8` while
building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/204/builds/5082
Here is the releva
farzonl wrote:
> LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
> `amdgpu-offload-ubuntu-22-cmake-build-only` running on `rocm-docker-ubu-22`
> while building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
>
> Full details are available at:
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/203/builds/6269
>
>
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`amdgpu-offload-rhel-9-cmake-build-only` running on `rocm-docker-rhel-9` while
building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/205/builds/5060
Here is the releva
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`amdgpu-offload-ubuntu-22-cmake-build-only` running on `rocm-docker-ubu-22`
while building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/203/builds/6269
Here is the rel
https://github.com/farzonl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133619
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nikic wrote:
@farzonl Instructions in the sense of the instructions retired during
compilation, not the number of instructions in the object file :)
I wouldn't expect the changes you made here to have any significant impact on
build time. (I guess it might serialize the build more, maybe?)
ht
farzonl wrote:
I also did some per obj file testing for compile time and file size and
instruction count. I think there might be a win here. You reported that [SPIR
was producing 30m
instructions](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132252#issuecomment-2744454287)
I don't see anything
farzonl wrote:
@nikic what is considered a neglible difference in elapsesed time? Elapsed is
consistently a little more after my change in the order of 5-20 seconds.
Examples below:
## Specs
```
processor : 63
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 25
model : 8
model
https://github.com/jthackray approved this pull request.
Thanks for this fix. LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133619
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133619
fixes #133199
PR #132252 Created a second file that shared `.cpp` in
`clang/lib/CodeGen/CMakeLists.txt`
For example There were two `AMDGPU.cpp`'s one in `TargetBuiltins` and the other
in `Targets`. Even thou
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
fixes #133199
PR #132252 Created a second file that shared `.cpp`
in `clang/lib/CodeGen/CMakeLists.txt`
For example There were two `AMDGPU.cpp`'s one in `TargetBuiltins` and the other
in `Targ
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
fixes #133199
PR #132252 Created a second file that shared `.cpp`
in `clang/lib/CodeGen/CMakeLists.txt`
For example There were two `AMDGPU.cpp`'s one in `TargetBuiltins` and the other
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu
Author: Farzon Lotfi (farzonl)
Changes
fixes #133199
PR #132252 Created a second file that shared `.cpp`
in `clang/lib/CodeGen/CMakeLists.txt`
For example There were two `AMDGPU.cpp`'s one in `TargetBuiltins` and the other
21 matches
Mail list logo
