[clang] [CMake][Release] Build with -ffat-lto-objects (PR #140381)

2025-05-24 Thread Nikita Popov via cfe-commits
https://github.com/nikic commented: This is an improvement, but should we also strip the bitcode? Otherwise people will still get errors if they try to use the archives if their host clang version is older. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140381 __

[clang] [CMake][Release] Build with -ffat-lto-objects (PR #140381)

2025-05-17 Thread Tom Stellard via cfe-commits
https://github.com/tstellar created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140381 Fixes #133580 >From abf0d25f2197cb154ec7afd7bca5962975742b44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Stellard Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 16:40:51 + Subject: [PATCH] [CMake][Release] Build with -ffat-lto-objects Fi

[clang] [CMake][Release] Build with -ffat-lto-objects (PR #140381)

2025-05-17 Thread via cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Tom Stellard (tstellar) Changes Fixes #133580 --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140381.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/cmake/caches/Release.cmake (+4-1) ``diff diff --git a/clang/cmake/caches/