llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-m68k-linux-cross`
running on `suse-gary-m68k-cross` while building `clang` at step 4 "build stage
1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/27/builds/1746
Here is the relevant piece o
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast` running on `sie-linux-worker` while
building `clang` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/11191
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115494
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Aaron Ballman (AaronBallman)
Changes
This paper made qualified function types implementation-defined. We have always
supported this as an extension, so now we're documenting our behavior.
Note, we still warn about this by default even in
https://github.com/AaronBallman created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115494
This paper made qualified function types implementation-defined. We have always
supported this as an extension, so now we're documenting our behavior.
Note, we still warn about this by default even in C2y
