https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118687
>From 10985bcd5ae13f4533a9df4fa3035bd49e49af15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 14:31:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [C++20] Deleting destructors can be noexcept
Given a `n
@@ -1206,15 +1206,16 @@ CanThrowResult Sema::canThrow(const Stmt *S) {
CT = CT_Dependent;
} else {
const FunctionDecl *OperatorDelete = DE->getOperatorDelete();
- CT = canCalleeThrow(*this, DE, OperatorDelete);
- if (const RecordType *RT = DTy->getAs()
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118687
>From 10985bcd5ae13f4533a9df4fa3035bd49e49af15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 14:31:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [C++20] Deleting destructors can be noexcept
Given a `n
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fcxx-exceptions
-Wno-unevaluated-expression -std=c++20 %s
AaronBallman wrote:
That test file has a lot of dynamic exception specification code in it, so it's
leaning heavily on `-std=c++11`.
https://g
@@ -1206,15 +1206,16 @@ CanThrowResult Sema::canThrow(const Stmt *S) {
CT = CT_Dependent;
} else {
const FunctionDecl *OperatorDelete = DE->getOperatorDelete();
- CT = canCalleeThrow(*this, DE, OperatorDelete);
- if (const RecordType *RT = DTy->getAs()
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118687
>From 10985bcd5ae13f4533a9df4fa3035bd49e49af15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 14:31:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [C++20] Deleting destructors can be noexcept
Given a `n
@@ -654,6 +654,9 @@ Bug Fixes in This Version
- Fixed a crash when GNU statement expression contains invalid statement
(#GH113468).
- Fixed a failed assertion when using ``__attribute__((noderef))`` on an
``_Atomic``-qualified type (#GH116124).
+- No longer return ``false``
@@ -1205,11 +1205,12 @@ CanThrowResult Sema::canThrow(const Stmt *S) {
if (DTy.isNull() || DTy->isDependentType()) {
CT = CT_Dependent;
} else {
- CT = canCalleeThrow(*this, DE, DE->getOperatorDelete());
+ const FunctionDecl *OperatorDelete = DE->getOper
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Aaron Ballman (AaronBallman)
Changes
Given a `noexcept` operator with an operand that calls `delete`, Clang was not
considering whether the selected `operator delete` function was a destroying
delete or not when inspecting whether the del
@@ -654,6 +654,9 @@ Bug Fixes in This Version
- Fixed a crash when GNU statement expression contains invalid statement
(#GH113468).
- Fixed a failed assertion when using ``__attribute__((noderef))`` on an
``_Atomic``-qualified type (#GH116124).
+- No longer return ``false``
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fcxx-exceptions
-Wno-unevaluated-expression -std=c++20 %s
shafik wrote:
We already have
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.unary.noexcept/sema.cpp
mayb
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118687
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118687
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118687
Given a `noexcept` operator with an operand that calls `delete`, Clang was not
considering whether the selected `operator delete` function was a destroying
delete or not when inspecting whether the deleted
14 matches
Mail list logo
