hubert-reinterpretcast wrote:
@daltenty, can we also have a check that the driver does not pass `-pthread` to
the frontend when `-no-pthread` is used?
As a complication, I think the code responsible is common cross-platform code
in
[clang/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp](https://github.com/llvm/l
https://github.com/daltenty updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69363
>From 560bf7329998e88d0ba12a2030b376d4a5aa173b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Tenty
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:53:55 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AIX][clang][driver] fix no-pthread option
We don't properly
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: David Tenty (daltenty)
Changes
We don't properly check the boolean pthread option in the AIX toolchain, so we
don't respect the no- form of the option.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69363.diff
2 Files Affected
https://github.com/daltenty created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69363
We don't properly check the boolean pthread option in the AIX toolchain, so we
don't respect the no- form of the option.
>From 560bf7329998e88d0ba12a2030b376d4a5aa173b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Tenty
