xiangzhangllvm added a comment.
+1 first, didn't see key problems.
Comment at: clang/lib/Headers/amxintrin.h:326
+__DEFAULT_FN_ATTRS_BF16
+static void __tile_tdpbf16ps(__tile1024i *dst, __tile1024i src1,
+ __tile1024i src2) {
yubing
yubing added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/Headers/amxintrin.h:326
+__DEFAULT_FN_ATTRS_BF16
+static void __tile_tdpbf16ps(__tile1024i *dst, __tile1024i src1,
+ __tile1024i src2) {
Should we align this with "tile_dpbssd" by ren
This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds.
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG4bc7c8631ad6: [X86] Support amx-bf16 intrinsic. (authored by
LiuChen3).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://r
LiuChen3 added a comment.
I don't know why pre-merge-checks failed. I can check-all successfully locally
in redhat8. I don't have debian mainchine to reproduce this problem.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97358/new/
https://reviews
pengfei accepted this revision.
pengfei added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97358/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97358
__
LiuChen3 updated this revision to Diff 326002.
LiuChen3 added a comment.
Address Pengfei and Yuanke's comments. We don't need more tile type.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97358/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97358
Files:
clang/i
pengfei added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/Headers/amxintrin.h:283
+typedef struct __tile1024bf16_str {
+ const unsigned short row;
LiuChen3 wrote:
> LuoYuanke wrote:
> > pengfei wrote:
> > > Is there much value to differentiate the type? We are usin
LiuChen3 added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/Headers/amxintrin.h:283
+typedef struct __tile1024bf16_str {
+ const unsigned short row;
LuoYuanke wrote:
> pengfei wrote:
> > Is there much value to differentiate the type? We are using the same AMX
> > t
LuoYuanke added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/Headers/amxintrin.h:283
+typedef struct __tile1024bf16_str {
+ const unsigned short row;
pengfei wrote:
> Is there much value to differentiate the type? We are using the same AMX type
> in the builtins. W
pengfei added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/Headers/amxintrin.h:283
+typedef struct __tile1024bf16_str {
+ const unsigned short row;
Is there much value to differentiate the type? We are using the same AMX type
in the builtins. What do you think? @Lu
LiuChen3 updated this revision to Diff 325988.
LiuChen3 added a comment.
Adding back 'avx512f' to amx-tile-basic.ll
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97358/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97358
Files:
clang/include/clang/Basic/Builtin
LiuChen3 created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: pengfei, hiraditya.
LiuChen3 requested review of this revision.
Herald added projects: clang, LLVM.
Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits.
Adding support for intrinsics of AMX-BF16.
This patch alse fix a bug that AMX-INT8 inst
12 matches
Mail list logo