alexfh added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D9556#282718, @xazax.hun wrote:
> Unfortunately I had no time to work on this patch, and after I did not finish
> this the team I was working in took a different approach: running static
> analyzer checker through clang and tidy checkers throug
xazax.hun added a comment.
Unfortunately I had no time to work on this patch, and after I did not finish
this the team I was working in took a different approach: running static
analyzer checker through clang and tidy checkers through clang tidy. Initially
we wanted to avoid this approach, beca
alexfh added a comment.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9555 depends on this patch. Are these two patches
still interesting to someone?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9556
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mai
alexfh added a comment.
What's the state here?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9556
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
