[PATCH] D76534: [clang/docs] Fix various sphinx warnings/errors in docs.

rjmccall added a comment. Sure. I'm not asking you to fix this, I'm just asking your opinion about the right thing to do. Is the Sphinx warning reasonable, such that we should fix our (autogenerated, IIRC) input to avoid the "redundant" spellings, or should we ask Sphinx to handle it more gra

[PATCH] D76534: [clang/docs] Fix various sphinx warnings/errors in docs.

fhahn added a comment. In D76534#1934943 , @rjmccall wrote: > Is the option issue causing the documentation to be wrong in any way, or does > it just produce a warning? If the latter, we could raise this issue with > them. I think it just produces a w

[PATCH] D76534: [clang/docs] Fix various sphinx warnings/errors in docs.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rG684ee2057f5d: [clang/docs] Fix various sphinx warnings/errors in docs. (authored by fhahn). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D76534/new/ https:/

[PATCH] D76534: [clang/docs] Fix various sphinx warnings/errors in docs.

rjmccall accepted this revision. rjmccall added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Is the option issue causing the documentation to be wrong in any way, or does it just produce a warning? If the latter, we could raise this issue with them. Repository: rG LLVM Github

[PATCH] D76534: [clang/docs] Fix various sphinx warnings/errors in docs.

fhahn created this revision. fhahn added reviewers: jfb, Bigcheese, dexonsmith. Herald added a project: clang. Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits. There are a few places with unexpected indents that trip over sphinx and other syntax errors. Also, the C++ syntax highlighting does not work for