Szelethus added inline comments.
Comment at: docs/analyzer/checkers.rst:1946
+Checkers used for debugging the analyzer.
+:doc:`DebugChecks` page contains a detailed description.
+
NoQ wrote:
> The error is on this line. It might be that this link should mention t
NoQ added a comment.
Dunno but made a random guess in the inline comment.
Comment at: docs/analyzer/checkers.rst:1946
+Checkers used for debugging the analyzer.
+:doc:`DebugChecks` page contains a detailed description.
+
The error is on this line. It might be t
Szelethus added a comment.
I'm getting a single buildbot failure, but I'm a little unsure how to fix it.
Could you help?
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-sphinx-docs/builds/36985
24.610 [1/1/1] Generating html Sphinx documentation for clang into
"/home/buildbot/llvm-build-dir/clang-sp
Szelethus added a comment.
I'll do the honors. Thanks!
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
NoQ added a comment.
P.S. I also support the idea to have a separate page per checker. It encourages
people to write as much documentation as necessary and continously expand it.
Otherwise there's a perception that all docs need to be roughly of the same
size and shape in order to make the page
NoQ accepted this revision.
NoQ added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I think let's get this up and running and slowly redirect links from the front
page to the new docs until only the front page is left?
Comment at: docs/analyzer/checkers.rst:36-37
Szelethus added a comment.
@NoQ @dcoughlin @george.karpenkov Any objections to this? :)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:/
Szelethus added a comment.
Cheers, this is as good as it gets! IRL we also mentioned making a unipage for
each checker which would be awesome (and would require a lot of tedious work),
but as a start, I'd much prefer browsing through this doc than the current one.
Very much appreciated!
I won'
Szelethus added a comment.
That I think sounds great! Thanks!
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mai
NoQ added a comment.
I poked Devin offline. It kinda seems to both of us that Sphinx is great for
documentation that is updated regularly, but our fancy front page should
probably stay. Similarly to how we still have the llvm.org front page, despite
all the documentation. It's kinda atmospheric
dkrupp added a comment.
@dcoughlin @NoQ ping...
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
dkrupp added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: gamesh411.
@dcoughlin could you please look into this?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
dkrupp updated this revision to Diff 173846.
dkrupp added a comment.
-scanbuild and xcode pictures are included now
-intro text ("What is Static Analysis?" etc.) are put under the Introduction
section
-Download section is created, but I am not sure how well was the this Mac OSX
binary release se
NoQ added a reviewer: dcoughlin.
NoQ added a subscriber: dcoughlin.
NoQ added a comment.
I think we should escalate this to cfe-dev first; this sounds pretty important.
@dcoughlin should definitely say a word here, as the code owner.
I agree that pictures and screenshots are very important to ke
Szelethus added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429#1295838, @george.karpenkov wrote:
> What do you propose we should do with other pages on the existing website?
> (OpenProjects / etc.)
I think we should just move everything here, and forget about the old site, as
there clearly isn
george.karpenkov added a comment.
From a first glance, it's missing screenshots and an introduction section.
What do you propose we should do with other pages on the existing website?
(OpenProjects / etc.)
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54429
_
16 matches
Mail list logo