dkrupp added inline comments.
Comment at: www/analyzer/open_projects.html:198
+ or using a dataflow framework.
+ (Difficulty: Hard)
+
Probably it is worth mentioning here, that there is a macro language already
for describing summaries of standard
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rC344663: [analyzer] [www] Updated a list of open projects
(authored by george.karpenkov, committed by ).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024?vs=169920&id=169933#toc
Repository:
rC
NoQ accepted this revision.
NoQ added a comment.
Ok, let's see if this actually works :)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
george.karpenkov updated this revision to Diff 169920.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024
Files:
clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html
Index: clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html
===
--- clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html
+++ cla
NoQ added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html:27-32
+New checkers which were contributed to the analyzer,
+but have not passed a rigorous evaluation process,
+are committed as "alpha checkers" (from "alpha version"),
+and are not ena
george.karpenkov added inline comments.
Herald added a subscriber: dkrupp.
Comment at: clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html:27-32
+New checkers which were contributed to the analyzer,
+but have not passed a rigorous evaluation process,
+are committed as "alpha checke
Szelethus added a comment.
Why d
Comment at: clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html:153
+ problem still remains open.
+
+ (Difficulty: Hard)
Did you mean to have this newline here? Difficulty seems to have a weird
placement when viewed in a browser.
NoQ added a comment.
The current text looks great.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
NoQ added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html:27-32
+New checkers which were contributed to the analyzer,
+but have not passed a rigorous evaluation process,
+are committed as "alpha checkers" (from "alpha version"),
+and are not ena
Szelethus added a comment.
I dislike web development, but that would indeed be invaluable. I'll take a
look.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-
george.karpenkov added a comment.
@Szelethus thanks! BTW if you really want to invest into maintaining the
website,
I think it's totally worth it to change all contents to markdown,
and then have a script to generate HTML from that.
Committers would be expected to manually run that script.
This w
Szelethus accepted this revision.
Szelethus added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Thanks, this looks great!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi
george.karpenkov updated this revision to Diff 169758.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024
Files:
clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html
Index: clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html
===
--- clang/www/analyzer/open_projects.html
+++ cla
george.karpenkov added a comment.
I have tried to clean up the list.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Szelethus added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024#1262976, @george.karpenkov wrote:
> @Szelethus I take it this is mostly formed from @NoQ email? Language could
> use polishing in quite a few places, could I just commandeer this revision
> and try to fix it?
Yes it is. Though the
george.karpenkov added a comment.
@Szelethus I take it this is mostly formed from @NoQ email? Language could use
polishing in quite a few places, could I just commandeer this revision and try
to fix it?
Comment at: www/analyzer/open_projects.html:29
+Implement a dataflow
NoQ added a comment.
> In addition 2018 Bay Area LLVM Developers' Meetings may bring some new open
> projects :)
Actually, let's commit this before the conference, even if it's not perfect, so
that people who suddenly get inspired to work on Static Analyzer already had an
updated list :)
==
Szelethus updated this revision to Diff 169193.
Szelethus added a comment.
- Fixed typos
- Fixed stupid characters (Thank you so much @MTC for going the extra mile and
opening this patch in a browser!)
- Removed outdated entries as mentioned by @MTC
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024
Files:
www
MTC added subscribers: teemperor, baloghadamsoftware, blitz.opensource.
MTC added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: donat.nagy.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53024#1258976, @Szelethus wrote:
> Also, a lot of items on this list is outdated, but I joined the project
> relatively recently, so I'
Szelethus added a comment.
Thanks!
I admit that the difficulty was mostly chosen at random, so that could be
brought closer to the actual difficulty of the project.
Comment at: www/analyzer/open_projects.html:86-87
+the opposite direction - integers to pointers - are comp
NoQ added a comment.
Whoa thanks! Will have a closer look again.
Comment at: www/analyzer/open_projects.html:33
+
+Handle aggregate construction.
+Aggregates are object that can be brace-initialized without calling a
I'll try to list other constructor k
Szelethus added a comment.
Mind you, there are some ideas I didn't add to the list -- I just don't know
how to put them to words nicely, but I'm on it.
Also, a lot of these is outdated, but I joined the project relatively recently,
so I'm not sure what's the state on all of them.
Repository:
Szelethus created this revision.
Szelethus added reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov, xazax.hun, MTC.
Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, jfb, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin,
rnkovacs, szepet, whisperity.
Added some extra tasks to the open projects. These are the ideas of @NoQ and
@george.karpenkov,
23 matches
Mail list logo
