Szelethus added a comment.
I personally find the registration process very error-prone, the current
infrastructure around it makes it super easy to mess up in a way that won't be
detected for months, so we probably need a better approach altogether. It
shouldn't be possible to do any harm withi
Szelethus added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: donat.nagy.
Bad news, this approach doesn't work too well, and here's why:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/master/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerRegistry.cpp#L115
void CheckerRegistry::initializeManager(CheckerManager &checkerMgr,
rnkovacs added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50211#1190146, @NoQ wrote:
> Welcome to the club!
:D
Thanks, makes me feel better.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50211
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.or
NoQ added a comment.
Welcome to the club!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50211
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rnkovacs closed this revision.
rnkovacs added a comment.
Committed in r339067, I just messed up the revision-closing line in the commit
message.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50211
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.ll
rnkovacs updated this revision to Diff 159244.
rnkovacs marked an inline comment as done.
rnkovacs added a comment.
Replace empty `Optional`s with `None`s.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50211
Files:
lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/InnerPointerChecker.cpp
lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/InterCheckerAPI.
NoQ added a comment.
Yay thx! Yeah, that's the best behavior i can imagine here.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50211
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
rnkovacs added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50211#1186630, @NoQ wrote:
> I see, so that's how it's done!
>
> I also noticed that checker name was weird in exploded graph dumps, i.e. it
> was showing regular new/delete stuff as if it was done by InnerPointer
> checker. I'll check if t
NoQ accepted this revision.
NoQ added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I see, so that's how it's done!
I also noticed that checker name was weird in exploded graph dumps, i.e. it was
showing regular new/delete stuff as if it was done by InnerPointer checker.
I'll chec
rnkovacs created this revision.
rnkovacs added reviewers: NoQ, xazax.hun, george.karpenkov.
Herald added subscribers: mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, dkrupp, szepet,
baloghadamsoftware, whisperity.
For `InnerPointerChecker` to function properly, both the checker itself and
`MallocChecker`'s capabili
10 matches
Mail list logo