Szelethus abandoned this revision.
Szelethus added a comment.
Turns out I was very wrong on this one. Lambdas should be ignored as data
members, but not in general.
Sorry about the spam, I think I should've sit longer on this one. I'll submit
another patch tomorrow that will correctly explain m
Szelethus added a comment.
> [...]lambda misuse in not really an uninitialized value problem.
I guess you can make the argument that it its. Even then, in my opinion this
checker is overkill for lambdas.
- If the captured variable has a non-default constructor,
`UninitializedValueChecker` will
Szelethus created this revision.
Szelethus added reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov, xazax.hun, rnkovacs, dkrupp.
Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, szepet,
whisperity.
After some thinking, I don't think this checker should support lambdas.
Reason 1.: While this is
