Anastasia added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D42844#1004663, @Fznamznon wrote:
> Yes, we don't have anything OpenCL specific for atomic pointers.
> But we have OpenCL specific in pointers and atomics separately and we have
> address spaces.
> Why not to test all at once?
We don't
Fznamznon added a comment.
Yes, we don't have anything OpenCL specific for atomic pointers.
But we have OpenCL specific in pointers and atomics separately and we have
address spaces.
Why not to test all at once?
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42844
___
Anastasia added a comment.
Sorry for delay... Does this test anything OpenCL specific? As far as I
remember we don't have any changes to `PointerType` with an atomic pointee type.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42844
___
cfe-comm
Fznamznon created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, Anastasia, yaxunl.
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42844
Files:
test/SemaOpenCL/atomic-ptr.cl
Index: test/SemaOpenCL/atomic-ptr.cl
===
---