[PATCH] D41319: libcxx: Fix for basic_stringbuf::seekoff() after r320604.

2017-12-19 Thread Peter Collingbourne via Phabricator via cfe-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. pcc marked an inline comment as done. Closed by commit rL321124: libcxx: Fix for basic_stringbuf::seekoff() after r320604. (authored by pcc, committed by ). Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41319?vs=1276

[PATCH] D41319: libcxx: Fix for basic_stringbuf::seekoff() after r320604.

2017-12-19 Thread Marshall Clow via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mclow.lists accepted this revision. mclow.lists added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. LGTM. I'm going to sprinkle `const` throughout this file later, but that is a drive-by thing. All the lines that start out `ptrdiff_t __hm = ` will soon be `const ptrdiff_t __hm = `

[PATCH] D41319: libcxx: Fix for basic_stringbuf::seekoff() after r320604.

2017-12-19 Thread Peter Collingbourne via Phabricator via cfe-commits
pcc updated this revision to Diff 127609. pcc added a comment. - Make __hm const https://reviews.llvm.org/D41319 Files: libcxx/include/sstream libcxx/test/std/input.output/string.streams/stringbuf/stringbuf.virtuals/seekoff.pass.cpp Index: libcxx/test/std/input.output/string.streams/str

[PATCH] D41319: libcxx: Fix for basic_stringbuf::seekoff() after r320604.

2017-12-19 Thread Marshall Clow via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mclow.lists added inline comments. Comment at: libcxx/include/sstream:580 return pos_type(-1); +ptrdiff_t __hm = __hm_ == nullptr ? 0 : __hm_ - __str_.data(); off_type __noff; This can be const. https://reviews.llvm.org/D41319 _

[PATCH] D41319: libcxx: Fix for basic_stringbuf::seekoff() after r320604.

2017-12-15 Thread Peter Collingbourne via Phabricator via cfe-commits
pcc created this revision. pcc added reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists. As a result of this change, the basic_stringbuf constructor that takes a mode ends up leaving __hm_ set to 0, causing the comparison "__hm_ - __str_.data() < __noff" in seekoff() to succeed, which caused the function to incorrect