ABataev added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#948399, @jdenny wrote:
> Alexey: I see that you committed the error message change, so I think this
> issue is done. Is Abandon Revision correct in this scenario? Sorry, I'm new
> here.
Yes, it is correct
https://reviews.llvm.org
jdenny added a comment.
Alexey: I see that you committed the error message change, so I think this
issue is done. Is Abandon Revision correct in this scenario? Sorry, I'm new
here.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe
jdenny added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945572, @ABataev wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945571, @jdenny wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945255, @ABataev wrote:
> >
> > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945234, @jdenny wrote:
> > >
> > > > r319774
ABataev added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945571, @jdenny wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945255, @ABataev wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945234, @jdenny wrote:
> >
> > > r319774 works for my current use cases. Thanks.
> > >
> > > While we're on thi
jdenny added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945255, @ABataev wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945234, @jdenny wrote:
>
> > r319774 works for my current use cases. Thanks.
> >
> > While we're on this topic, do you happen to know the rationale behind the
> > OpenMP restr
ABataev added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945234, @jdenny wrote:
> r319774 works for my current use cases. Thanks.
>
> While we're on this topic, do you happen to know the rationale behind the
> OpenMP restriction for which err_omp_union_type_not_allowed diagnoses
> violation
ABataev added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945234, @jdenny wrote:
> r319774 works for my current use cases. Thanks.
>
> While we're on this topic, do you happen to know the rationale behind the
> OpenMP restriction for which err_omp_union_type_not_allowed diagnoses
> violation
ABataev added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752#945234, @jdenny wrote:
> r319774 works for my current use cases. Thanks.
>
> While we're on this topic, do you happen to know the rationale behind the
> OpenMP restriction for which err_omp_union_type_not_allowed diagnoses
> violation
jdenny added a comment.
r319774 works for my current use cases. Thanks.
While we're on this topic, do you happen to know the rationale behind the
OpenMP restriction for which err_omp_union_type_not_allowed diagnoses
violations? I googled but couldn't find the rationale. If you would prefer
ABataev added a comment.
Fixed in a bit different way in r319774
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
10 matches
Mail list logo