dcoughlin added a comment.
Yeah, I'm not a fan of this style of testing for path diagnostics, either.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39691
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
george.karpenkov accepted this revision.
george.karpenkov added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks good to me.
I really don't think the test format chosen in `unix-fns.c` is a good idea, as
it is very large, auto-generated, and tightly coupled to chosen formatting.
