Yes, the thing that it's supposed to be testing is -Wuninitialized and
other analysis warnings.
I'll re-name the test and add more test cases to this effect shortly.
Thanks for the input.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:33 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 3:28 PM Eric Fiselier v
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 3:28 PM Eric Fiselier via Phabricator via
cfe-commits wrote:
> EricWF created this revision.
>
> @rsmith Is there a better place to put this test?
>
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D33660
>
> Files:
> lib/Sema/SemaCoroutine.cpp
> test/SemaCXX/coreturn.cpp
> test/SemaCXX
GorNishanov accepted this revision.
GorNishanov added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LBTM (Looks brilliant to me)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33660
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.
EricWF created this revision.
@rsmith Is there a better place to put this test?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33660
Files:
lib/Sema/SemaCoroutine.cpp
test/SemaCXX/coreturn.cpp
test/SemaCXX/coroutine-uninitialized-warning-crash.cpp
Index: test/SemaCXX/coroutine-uninitialized-warning-crash.cp
