Trass3r added a comment.
Has this ever gotten anywhere?
I think the correct mapping would be something like -fno-ms-compatibility
-fno-delayed-template-parsing, not sure about -fms-volatile -fms-extensions.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32435/new/
https://reviews.llvm.o
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:28 PM, David Majnemer
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Nico Weber wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:14 PM, David Majnemer > > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Nico Weber
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:06 PM, David
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Nico Weber wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:14 PM, David Majnemer
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:06 PM, David Majnemer <
>>> david.majne...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
On Tue, A
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:14 PM, David Majnemer
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:06 PM, David Majnemer > > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:00 PM, David Maj
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:06 PM, David Majnemer
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:00 PM, David Majnemer <
>>> david.majne...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
On Mon,
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:06 PM, David Majnemer
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:00 PM, David Majnemer <
>> david.majne...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Nico Weber
>>> wrote:
>>>
"Opting int
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:00 PM, David Majnemer > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
>>
>>> "Opting into the conforming mode, /permissive-, during the series of VS
>>> 2017 update is a commitment to keeping
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:00 PM, David Majnemer
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
>
>> "Opting into the conforming mode, /permissive-, during the series of VS
>> 2017 update is a commitment to keeping your code base clean and to fixing
>> non-conforming constructs
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
> "Opting into the conforming mode, /permissive-, during the series of VS
> 2017 update is a commitment to keeping your code base clean and to fixing
> non-conforming constructs we fix conformance issues in Visual C++." [...]
> "By contrast /per
majnemer: opinion on the above?
On Apr 24, 2017 2:56 PM, "Nico Weber" wrote:
> "Opting into the conforming mode, /permissive-, during the series of VS
> 2017 update is a commitment to keeping your code base clean and to fixing
> non-conforming constructs we fix conformance issues in Visual C++."
"Opting into the conforming mode, /permissive-, during the series of VS
2017 update is a commitment to keeping your code base clean and to fixing
non-conforming constructs we fix conformance issues in Visual C++." [...]
"By contrast /permissive- offers a useful conformance mode where input C++
code
-pedantic means "Issue all the warnings demanded by strict ISO C and ISO
C++; reject all programs that use forbidden extensions, and some other
programs that do not follow ISO C and ISO C++."
I believe it is more akin to -fno-ms-compatibility as it disables
compatibility hacks.
On Mon, Apr 24, 201
It does sound pretty similar to me from the blog post. I think this is a
decent place to start from.
On Apr 24, 2017 11:55 AM, "David Majnemer via Phabricator via cfe-commits" <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> majnemer requested changes to this revision.
> majnemer added a comment.
> This re
majnemer requested changes to this revision.
majnemer added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
I don't think this is correct. GDR (of Microsoft) says the behavior is
different:
https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/5dh7j5/visual_c_introduces_permissive_for_conformance/da5f
hans accepted this revision.
hans added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
lgtm
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32435
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
thakis created this revision.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2016/11/16/permissive-switch/ makes it
sound like this is similar to -pedantic, which we currently don't expose from
clang-cl. So map it to that for now and see how that feels in practice.
Looks like cl.exe only has a flag fo
16 matches
Mail list logo
