[PATCH] D31627: [coroutines] Skip over passthrough operator co_await

2017-05-22 Thread Gor Nishanov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
GorNishanov closed this revision. GorNishanov added a comment. r303605 = b026b234d55d6b9fab849389b2085204f530af5d https://reviews.llvm.org/D31627 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

[PATCH] D31627: [coroutines] Skip over passthrough operator co_await

2017-05-22 Thread Gor Nishanov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
GorNishanov added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31627#761320, @rsmith wrote: > Does it still make sense for us to have a `UO_Coawait` at all? As I recall, > the only purpose it ever had was to represent a dependent `co_await` > expression that couldn't yet be resolved to a `CoawaitExp

[PATCH] D31627: [coroutines] Skip over passthrough operator co_await

2017-05-22 Thread Richard Smith via Phabricator via cfe-commits
rsmith accepted this revision. rsmith added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Does it still make sense for us to have a `UO_Coawait` at all? As I recall, the only purpose it ever had was to represent a dependent `co_await` expression that couldn't yet be resolved to a `

[PATCH] D31627: [coroutines] Skip over passthrough operator co_await

2017-04-10 Thread Gor Nishanov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
GorNishanov added a comment. gentle ping https://reviews.llvm.org/D31627 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D31627: [coroutines] Skip over passthrough operator co_await

2017-04-03 Thread Gor Nishanov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
GorNishanov created this revision. https://reviews.llvm.org/D31627 Files: lib/CodeGen/CGCoroutine.cpp test/CodeGenCoroutines/coro-await.cpp Index: test/CodeGenCoroutines/coro-await.cpp === --- test/CodeGenCoroutines/coro-await.