rmaprath closed this revision.
rmaprath added a comment.
Committed as r283441.
Thanks!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24562
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rmaprath updated this revision to Diff 73759.
rmaprath added a comment.
Final patch to be committed, with all the remaining comments addressed.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24562
Files:
test/std/re/re.alg/re.alg.search/grep.pass.cpp
test/std/re/re.regex/re.regex.assign/assign.pass.cpp
test/s
EricWF added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24562#562339, @rmaprath wrote:
> First batch of XFAIL fixes.
>
> I've changed some XFAILs to UNSUPPORTED where the test is all about exception
> handling. In other cases, I've used the test macro TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS to
> conditionally excl
rmaprath updated this revision to Diff 73661.
rmaprath added a comment.
First batch of XFAIL fixes.
I've changed some XFAILs to UNSUPPORTED where the test is all about exception
handling. In other cases, I've used the test macro TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS to
conditionally exclude those parts that t
EricWF added a comment.
Feel free to send them in 10-20 at a time. It'll be much faster to review that
way.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24562
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-c
rmaprath added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24562#561442, @Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
> Looks like patch was not committed.
Need to replicate this to as many tests as possible (~150). I was hoping to do
all that and upload another diff for a final review, couldn't get to it I'm
afraid.
Eugene.Zelenko added a comment.
Looks like patch was not committed.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24562
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rmaprath added inline comments.
Comment at: test/std/re/re.alg/re.alg.search/grep.pass.cpp:25
@@ -25,2 +24,3 @@
+#ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
extern "C" void LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const char *data)
EricWF wrote:
> I prefer putting the `#if` on the inside of
EricWF accepted this revision.
EricWF added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
This approach looks great. I don't think we need to split things up into
separate files. This is exactly how `test_macros.h` should be used.
Feel free to convert as many tests as possible. I'v
rmaprath added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24562#542630, @mclow.lists wrote:
> What an awful test. I wonder who wrote such a steaming pile. Probably me.
I think I've thrown quite a lot of XFAILs like this in the past, just to get
the no-exceptions build passing. Now I've got to c
mclow.lists added a comment.
What an awful test. I wonder who wrote such a steaming pile. Probably me.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24562
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
rmaprath updated this revision to Diff 71349.
rmaprath added a comment.
(Added more context)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24562
Files:
test/std/re/re.alg/re.alg.search/grep.pass.cpp
Index: test/std/re/re.alg/re.alg.search/grep.pass.cpp
===
rmaprath created this revision.
rmaprath added reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists.
rmaprath added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
When we added support for the no-exceptions build of `libc++`, all the tests
that used exceptions got a blanket XFAIL for the no-exceptions variety.
Previously, we tried to fi
13 matches
Mail list logo