zaks.anna added a comment.
The thread from cfe-dev is called "Clang Static Analyzer: False Positive
Suppression Support":
http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Clang-Static-Analyzer-False-Positive-Suppression-Support-tt4053071.html
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24411
__
nikhgupt added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D24411#545381, @zaks.anna wrote:
> It is not clear to me that we've reached a consensus on cfe-dev list that
> suppressing with comments and printing the checker name is the way to go.
I'm new to the LLVM upstreaming process and have not be
zaks.anna added a comment.
It is not clear to me that we've reached a consensus on cfe-dev list that
suppressing with comments and printing the checker name is the way to go.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24411
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@
hiraditya added a comment.
IIRC, I was the primary author of this code, I'd really appreciate if you could
attribute the code to the authors. Thanks
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24411
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://list