beanz added a comment.
I think doing just the suffix is the right starting point.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mgorny added a comment.
Do you think I should just focus on the suffix, or maybe try to make the whole
path configurable?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
beanz added a comment.
Looking more closely at this, there is a problem that I see.
The clang runtime directory only supports building compiler-rt, and is going to
be replaced by the llvm runtimes directory in the (hopefully near) future.
Maybe a better way to go is to define `RUNTIMES_LIBDIR_S
mgorny added a comment.
A gentle ping.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
beanz added a reviewer: rnk.
beanz added a comment.
This looks reasonable to me, but I'm not super familiar with multi-lib
conventions. I think @chandlerc is more familiar with how that stuff works.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23752
___
cfe-commits m
mgorny created this revision.
mgorny added reviewers: chandlerc, chapuni, samsonov.
mgorny added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Make it possible to override the value of CLANG_LIBDIR_SUFFIX, and use it
uniformly to control install location of runtimes (i.e. lib/clang), therefore
supporting sharing a
