filcab abandoned this revision.
filcab added a comment.
Thanks for clarifying, Richard.
I'll think about getting some fixes/tests in for our DRs.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18654
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llv
rsmith added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18654#388419, @filcab wrote:
> That means that our C++11 mode will have some fixes, right?
Right. The standard's rules are often incoherent or unimplementable without the
fixes in DRs, so it's not meaningful to implement ISO C++ as standardiz
That means that our C++11 mode will have some fixes, right?
How can we call what out C++11 mode is? Are there updated versions of
the standard? Are there lists of defects that we have fixed and others
we haven't?
Sorry, I'm not too familiar with how the standard+fixes usually work.
Thank you,
filcab added a subscriber: filcab.
filcab added a comment.
That means that our C++11 mode will have some fixes, right?
How can we call what out C++11 mode is? Are there updated versions of
the standard? Are there lists of defects that we have fixed and others
we haven't?
Sorry, I'm not too famili
rsmith requested changes to this revision.
rsmith added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Core issue 1457 is a DR against C++11, so it applies to our C++11 mode.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18654
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe
filcab created this revision.
filcab added reviewers: rsmith, samsonov.
filcab added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Clang was using C++14 rules for shifts into the sign bit with any C++
standard. Now it has the C++ <14 special case (same as C).
Using this C++11 standard draft as reference (before CWG
