rengolin added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17124#350229, @mcrosier wrote:
> Committed r260555.
It would have been better to commit the LLVM parts first. Now, there will be a
range where kyro will be accepted by Clang but broken when it gets to setup the
target.
--renato
http://r
mcrosier closed this revision.
mcrosier added a comment.
Committed r260555.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17124
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mcrosier added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17124#350130, @rengolin wrote:
> I'm assuming you also have the LLVM counterpart?
Yes, but I haven't made them public just yet.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17122
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17119
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17124
__
t.p.northover accepted this revision.
t.p.northover added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks reasonable to me.
Tim.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17124
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.l
rengolin added a comment.
I'm assuming you also have the LLVM counterpart?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17124
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits