chrisbazley added a comment.
Hi, thanks very much for looking at my patch. I added the link that you
proposed to all of the patches in the stack.
> Assuming that we want to go in this direction, it seems quite expensive to
> model this as a fast qualifier rather than an extended qualifier.
Tru
chrisbazley added a comment.
Please refer to
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-optional-a-type-qualifier-to-indicate-pointer-nullability/
and https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3089.pdf for the wider
context of this commit.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LA
rsmith added a comment.
Including a link to the RFC
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-optional-a-type-qualifier-to-indicate-pointer-nullability/68004/2)
in each of the patches in this series would be helpful.
Assuming that we want to go in this direction, it seems quite expensive to
model this
rriddle added a comment.
I don't understand the MLIR changes here, how are they relevant to the patch?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142733/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D142733
___
cfe-c
chrisbazley created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: Moerafaat, zero9178, bzcheeseman, sdasgup3,
wenzhicui, wrengr, cota, teijeong, rdzhabarov, tatianashp, jdoerfert,
msifontes, jurahul, Kayjukh, grosul1, Joonsoo, liufengdb, aartbik, mgester,
arpith-jacob, antiagainst, shauheen, rriddle,
