hintonda added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12646#241493, @bob.wilson wrote:
> On Darwin platforms, the libc++ headers are expected to be installed
> alongside clang. If you're not doing that, then you're building it wrong.
> Adding more fallback options for finding the headers just m
bob.wilson added a comment.
On Darwin platforms, the libc++ headers are expected to be installed alongside
clang. If you're not doing that, then you're building it wrong. Adding more
fallback options for finding the headers just makes things worse, because
instead of a clear failure, you're mor
thakis added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12646#241318, @hintonda wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12646#241308, @kubabrecka wrote:
>
> > In what scenario exactly are you seeing an issue? If it's a just-built
> > clang that can't find C++ headers, then you should just build the li
hintonda added a comment.
> I think it works if you a) check out libcxx into llvm/projects/libcxx b) run
> `make install` and c) run the binary from your install directory.
Yes, that works. But why shouldn't users be able to use the installed version?
Also, if you want to force users to eithe
kubabrecka added a comment.
> > I first noticed it when I tried to run the version of clang-tidy I'd just
> > built and found I had to pass the path for it to find iostream.
>
>
> I think it works if you a) check out libcxx into llvm/projects/libcxx b) run
> `make install` and c) run the bi
hintonda added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12646#241308, @kubabrecka wrote:
> In what scenario exactly are you seeing an issue? If it's a just-built clang
> that can't find C++ headers, then you should just build the libcxx project
> alongside.
clang++ defaults to -stdlib=libc++ f
kubabrecka added a comment.
In what scenario exactly are you seeing an issue? If it's a just-built clang
that can't find C++ headers, then you should just build the libcxx project
alongside.
Comment at: lib/Driver/ToolChains.cpp:290-295
@@ +289,8 @@
+
+ // FIXME: We shou
Not sure why arc removed some reviewers when I added the latest diff, but
I've added them back.
Sorry for the noise...
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:36 PM, don hinton wrote:
> hintonda updated this revision to Diff 34175.
> hintonda removed reviewers: thakis, EricWF, kubabrecka.
> hintonda added a c
hintonda updated this revision to Diff 34175.
hintonda removed reviewers: thakis, EricWF, kubabrecka.
hintonda added a comment.
Removed redundant code from InitHeaderSearch.cpp, it's handled more cleanly in
AddClangCXXStdlibIncludeArgs.
Also, newer versions of OSX add libc++ as the default. Per
hintonda created this revision.
hintonda added a reviewer: rsmith.
hintonda added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
Current behavior doesn't add c++ header path if libc++ wasn't installed via
macports in /usr. This change will try to locate c++ headers from various
locations, including in tree, via ma
10 matches
Mail list logo