> On 2016-Jan-22, at 18:01, Eric Fiselier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
> wrote:
>
> > On 2016-Jan-21, at 22:22, Eric Fiselier wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 2016-Jan-21,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <
dexonsm...@apple.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2016-Jan-21, at 22:22, Eric Fiselier wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <
> dexonsm...@apple.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2016-Jan-21, at 17:59, Eric Fiselie
> On 2016-Jan-21, at 22:22, Eric Fiselier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
> wrote:
>
> > On 2016-Jan-21, at 17:59, Eric Fiselier wrote:
> >
> > EricWF added a comment.
> >
> > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12354#331776, @dexonsmith wrote:
> >
> >> Thi
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <
dexonsm...@apple.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2016-Jan-21, at 17:59, Eric Fiselier wrote:
> >
> > EricWF added a comment.
> >
> > In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12354#331776, @dexonsmith wrote:
> >
> >> This patch looks correct to me. Is there any
> On 2016-Jan-21, at 17:59, Eric Fiselier wrote:
>
> EricWF added a comment.
>
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12354#331776, @dexonsmith wrote:
>
>> This patch looks correct to me. Is there any reason it wasn't committed?
>
>
> I was concerned about using a function-local static in the librar
EricWF added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12354#331776, @dexonsmith wrote:
> This patch looks correct to me. Is there any reason it wasn't committed?
I was concerned about using a function-local static in the library headers, I
don't think libc++ does that anywhere else and I wanted
dexonsmith added a subscriber: dexonsmith.
dexonsmith added a comment.
This patch looks correct to me. Is there any reason it wasn't committed?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12354
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm
This patch looks correct to me. Is there any reason it wasn't committed?
> On 2015-Aug-25, at 22:22, Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>
> EricWF updated this revision to Diff 33180.
> EricWF added a comment.
>
> Cleanup the diff and remove extra changes.
>
>
> https://urldefense.proof
EricWF updated this revision to Diff 33180.
EricWF added a comment.
Cleanup the diff and remove extra changes.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12354
Files:
include/__debug
include/algorithm
test/libcxx/algorithms/debug_less.pass.cpp
test/support/debug_mode.h
Index: test/support/debug_mode.h
=
EricWF updated this revision to Diff 33179.
EricWF added a comment.
Remove all functions in the dylib and make them inline.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12354
Files:
include/__debug
include/algorithm
include/regex
src/debug.cpp
test/libcxx/algorithms/debug_less.pass.cpp
test/support/deb
EricWF created this revision.
EricWF added a reviewer: mclow.lists.
EricWF added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This patch adds a global assertion handler that is called when _LIBCPP_ASSERT
fails. This allows us to test debug mode features without _LIBCPP_ASSERT always
calling `abort()`.
This patch
11 matches
Mail list logo