Add --cached option to git-clang-format which behaves analogously to
--cached for other git subcommands, by causing the operation to work
against the index state rather than the working directory state.
This can be particularly useful for hook scripts which need to check or
change the formatting o
On 02/08/2016 12:32 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
I believe you forgot to add cfe-commits as subscriber on the patch.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 12:51 PM Alexander Shukaev <
cl...@alexander.shukaev.name> wrote:
On 12/14/2015 10:03 PM, Alexander Shukaev wrote:
On 12/11/2015 04:40 PM, Daniel Jasper wrot
I believe you forgot to add cfe-commits as subscriber on the patch.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 12:51 PM Alexander Shukaev <
cl...@alexander.shukaev.name> wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 10:03 PM, Alexander Shukaev wrote:
> > On 12/11/2015 04:40 PM, Daniel Jasper wrote:
> >> Please submit patches to clang-form
On 12/14/2015 10:03 PM, Alexander Shukaev wrote:
On 12/11/2015 04:40 PM, Daniel Jasper wrote:
Please submit patches to clang-format to reviews.llvm.org. Also, any
change
no matter how easy it is to deduce from the code itself deserves a proper
change description :-). Bullet points are fine.
Th
On 12/11/2015 04:40 PM, Daniel Jasper wrote:
Please submit patches to clang-format to reviews.llvm.org. Also, any change
no matter how easy it is to deduce from the code itself deserves a proper
change description :-). Bullet points are fine.
Thanks for the quick reply. I've submitted the patc
Please submit patches to clang-format to reviews.llvm.org. Also, any change
no matter how easy it is to deduce from the code itself deserves a proper
change description :-). Bullet points are fine.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
> +djasper
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:40
+djasper
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:40 PM Alexander Shukaev via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Please, consider applying the attached patch or (at your option) a
> refined version of it upstream. I'd be very excited to see it make into
> the upcoming 3.8 re
Hello everyone,
Please, consider applying the attached patch or (at your option) a
refined version of it upstream. I'd be very excited to see it make into
the upcoming 3.8 release. The patch looks self-explanatory but in case
any questions should arise, feel free to ask. I can provide both
