Even if it still did add overhead, it seems perfectly reasonable, from a
user's perspective (namely mine), that if I introduce unnecessary narrowing
matchers to my chain that there may be a performance penalty.
The ability to do the following easily outweighs any performance issues for
me:
anyOf
I was wondering if there is any objection to removing the 2-element minimum
on the eachOf, anyOf and allOf matchers.
It is frustrating when playing with matchers to have to edit significant
amounts of code to be able to temporarily go from 2 to 1 matcher inside an
any- or allOf matcher.
And overa
