cyyself wrote:
I think some feature is missing here, such as "Zvbb".
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123193
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cyyself wrote:
> Two comments:
>
> * I don't think the c-api-doc change is going to be accepted at this rate
I agree. I also changed my mind now through the discussion from the c-api-doc
PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115981
___
cfe-
cyyself wrote:
> I disagree that this is a thing which should exist. It's solving the problem
> in the wrong place.
Since a clean solution needs GLIBC update, I think this can be a workaround now
for some generated IFUNC resolvers, such as target_clones or target_versions.
https://github.com/
cyyself wrote:
I have a question: SpacemiT-X60 does not support Zicclsm on Vector, which is
the same as K230, as discussed in #88029 . Is the Zicclsm safe here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94564
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@l
@@ -2002,6 +2003,76 @@ bool sys::getHostCPUFeatures(StringMap &Features) {
return true;
}
+#elif defined(__linux__) && defined(__riscv)
+// struct riscv_hwprobe
+struct RISCVHwProbe {
+ int64_t Key;
+ uint64_t Value;
+};
+bool sys::getHostCPUFeatures(StringMap &Features) {