[clang-tools-extra] Enforce SL.con.3: Add check to replace operator[] with at() (PR #90043)

https://github.com/sebwolf-de updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90043 >From 8eb5863305e8f9a1311a540faf35f24fc6f55c6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Wolf Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:16:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Enforce SL.con.3: Add check to replace operator[] with a

[clang-tools-extra] Enforce SL.con.3: Add check to replace operator[] with at() (PR #90043)

https://github.com/sebwolf-de created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90043 The string based test to find out whether the check is applicable on the class is not ideal, but I did not find a more elegant way, yet. If there is more clang-query magic available, that I'm not aware of, I'