[PATCH] D106889: [examples] Fix the clang-interpreter example for changes in 2487db1f2862

2021-08-13 Thread Ryan Mansfield via Phabricator via cfe-commits
rmansfield abandoned this revision. rmansfield added a comment. This got fixed by b4c0307d598004cfd96c770d2a4a84a37c838ba9 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106889/ne

[PATCH] D106889: [examples] Fix the clang-interpreter example for changes in 2487db1f2862

2021-07-27 Thread Ryan Mansfield via Phabricator via cfe-commits
rmansfield created this revision. rmansfield added a reviewer: lhames. rmansfield requested review of this revision. Herald added a project: clang. Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo https://reviews.llvm.org/D106889 Files: clang/examples/clang-interpr

[PATCH] D79293: [clang-format] [PR45218] Fix an issue where < and > and >> in a for loop gets incorrectly interpreted at a TemplateOpener/Closer

2020-05-02 Thread Ryan Mansfield via Phabricator via cfe-commits
rmansfield added a comment. They're overly reduced examples ;) but embedded programmers tend to make heavy use of shift operators, including within for loops and if stmts CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D79293/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D79293 ___

[PATCH] D79293: [clang-format] [PR45218] Fix an issue where < and > and >> in a for loop gets incorrectly interpreted at a TemplateOpener/Closer

2020-05-02 Thread Ryan Mansfield via Phabricator via cfe-commits
rmansfield added a comment. Couple examples: void foo(int x) { for (unsigned int i = 0; i < x >> 1; i++) { } } and int i = 0; if (i < x >> 1) {} } CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D79293/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D79293 _