rajkumarananthu wrote:
as per the conversation, closing and discarding the PR, will add individual PR
addressing the review comments.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102894
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/rajkumarananthu closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102894
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rajkumarananthu wrote:
Hi @mydeveloperday, I will close this PR and correct it by making individual
PRs for individual features.
Thankyou
Rajkumar.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102894
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
@@ -47,8 +47,7 @@ void printLine(llvm::raw_ostream &OS, const UnwrappedLine
&Line,
OS << Prefix;
NewLine = false;
}
-OS << I->Tok->Tok.getName() << "["
- << "T=" << (unsigned)I->Tok->getType()
+OS << I->Tok->Tok.getName() << "[" << "T=" << (unsign
rajkumarananthu wrote:
Thankyou @HazardyKnusperkeks for the review, I am beginner level contributor to
LLVM Project and that might be the reason I might have missed some minor
details. I will address them. And as advised I will close this pull-request and
split into multiple small reviews afte
rajkumarananthu wrote:
I see there are some tests failing, I ran check-llvm, but I think it is the
wrong one, I will fix them, meanwhile please proceed with the source
code-review.
Thanks
Rajkumar Ananthu.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102894
__
https://github.com/rajkumarananthu created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102894
Issue #53390 was reported to have an option to control indenting namespace
aliases independently of NamespaceIndentation, added this feature.
Issue #58710 was reported to have an option to control the d
rajkumarananthu wrote:
Thanks for taking care of this @AaronBallman
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68127
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rajkumarananthu wrote:
Hi @AaronBallman I could see a revert of my change here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGa6acf3fd49a20c570a390af2a3c84e10b9545b68
Can you please help me confirm whether the change is accepted or reverted.
Should we resubmit the changes here?
Thanks
Rajkumar Ananthu
https://
@@ -4628,6 +4628,12 @@ ASTFileSignature ASTWriter::WriteAST(Sema &SemaRef,
StringRef OutputFile,
WritingAST = true;
ASTHasCompilerErrors = hasErrors;
+ bool trueHasErrors =
SemaRef.PP.getDiagnostics().hasUncompilableErrorOccurred();
rajkumarananthu wrot
https://github.com/rajkumarananthu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68127
>From b76f4d351b3e55e2095e3be088a50fdb76d6b7f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajkumar Ananthu
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 21:53:59 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fixes and closes #53952
The issue #53952 is report
@@ -4628,6 +4628,12 @@ ASTFileSignature ASTWriter::WriteAST(Sema &SemaRef,
StringRef OutputFile,
WritingAST = true;
ASTHasCompilerErrors = hasErrors;
+ bool trueHasErrors =
SemaRef.PP.getDiagnostics().hasUncompilableErrorOccurred();
rajkumarananthu wrot
https://github.com/rajkumarananthu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68127
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4628,6 +4628,12 @@ ASTFileSignature ASTWriter::WriteAST(Sema &SemaRef,
StringRef OutputFile,
WritingAST = true;
ASTHasCompilerErrors = hasErrors;
+ bool trueHasErrors =
SemaRef.PP.getDiagnostics().hasUncompilableErrorOccurred();
rajkumarananthu wrot
https://github.com/rajkumarananthu edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68127
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rajkumarananthu created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68127
The issue #53952 is reported indicating clang is giving a crashing pch file,
when hasErrors is been passed incorrectly to WriteAST method.
To fix the issue, I have a added an assertion to make sure the g
16 matches
Mail list logo