nilanjana87 wrote:
> We evaluated profi internally (at Google) last year. Our configuration uses
> AutoFDO with [flow-sensitive discriminators
> ](https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146694.html)
> (FS-AFDO). We found slight regressions with this configuration and didn't
>
https://github.com/nilanjana87 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nilanjana87 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/nilanjana87 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145957
- Enable -fsample-profile-use-profi flag by default for SamplePGO
- Add -fno_sample_profile_use_profi flag for opting out
>From f0893f3b64661fc5a6ab39e7bdcc86a9142221a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nilanja
