https://github.com/Snape3058 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Snape3058 wrote:
Updated as suggested.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1186,6 +1192,14 @@ def main():
"displaying it, dump the rewritten dot file "
"to stdout",
)
+dump_conflict.add_argument(
+"--dump-html-only",
+action="store_const",
+dest="dump_html_only",
+const=True,
+default
@@ -479,12 +479,15 @@ def add_raw_line(self, raw_line):
# A visitor that dumps the ExplodedGraph into a DOT file with fancy HTML-based
# syntax highlighing.
class DotDumpVisitor:
-def __init__(self, do_diffs, dark_mode, gray_mode, topo_mode,
dump_dot_only):
+def __init
@@ -479,12 +479,15 @@ def add_raw_line(self, raw_line):
# A visitor that dumps the ExplodedGraph into a DOT file with fancy HTML-based
# syntax highlighing.
class DotDumpVisitor:
-def __init__(self, do_diffs, dark_mode, gray_mode, topo_mode,
dump_dot_only):
+def __init
https://github.com/Snape3058 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Snape3058 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85515
>From 1d37cd1a7dac2ddb05fdcf125483991b3ac645d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ella Ma
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:25:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] allow egraph rewriter not to open html directly
---
.../utils/a
https://github.com/Snape3058 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85515
>From 1d37cd1a7dac2ddb05fdcf125483991b3ac645d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ella Ma
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:25:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] allow egraph rewriter not to open html directly
---
.../utils/a
https://github.com/Snape3058 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85515
When developing on a headless device through SSH, we do not have a browser or
even an X environment. Hence, it would be more convenient if the rewriter could
stop before attempting to open the generated HTML f
@@ -1090,7 +1090,8 @@ static bool isStandardNewDelete(const FunctionDecl *FD) {
// If the header for operator delete is not included, it's still defined
// in an invalid source location. Check to make sure we don't crash.
return !L.isValid() ||
- FD->getASTContext
Snape3058 wrote:
This version is just a trivial workaround for this issue. Refer to the FIXME
comment in the checker. Feel free to provide suggestions on fixing this bug.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85224
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe
https://github.com/Snape3058 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85224
Fixes #62985
When 3rd-party header files are included as system headers, their overloaded
`new` and `delete` operators are also considered as the std ones. However,
those overloaded operator functions will a
Snape3058 wrote:
Add suggested reviewers for this PR. I am unfamiliar with the engine code.
> mzyKi force-pushed the bugfix/crash-on-getAdjustedParameterIndex branch
Please do not force push to your forked repo later after receiving suggestions
from other reviewers. This will make previous sug
https://github.com/Snape3058 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71073
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Snape3058 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71073
>From 90d72a1f1036d2486e66c5ec16c3a8dc4241fc00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ella Ma
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 23:14:15 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Add a test case to PR-70792 for
Issue-59493
--
https://github.com/Snape3058 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71073
Following PR #70792 for issue #70464
Add a test case for issue #59493
>From 90d72a1f1036d2486e66c5ec16c3a8dc4241fc00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ella Ma
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 23:14:15 +0800
Subject: [PATC
Snape3058 wrote:
OK, thanks~
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Snape3058 wrote:
Do I need to
* create a new PR?
* push directly to this PR on the original branch `Snape3058:issue-70464`?
* commit directly without revision?
Which operation is correct?
(Sorry for not familiar with GitHub) -(
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
__
Snape3058 wrote:
As #59493 is an array, which is different from the test case I provided and the
ones in #61919 and #54533,
although this pr can correctly handle the array case, do I still need to add
the array one to the test case?
```cpp
// Additional test case from issue #59493
namespace in
https://github.com/Snape3058 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Snape3058 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
>From afda56104e079c177d7941ff1394636cb48e7347 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ella Ma
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 18:41:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [analyzer] Fix uninitialized base class with initializer list
when c
@@ -1222,6 +1222,15 @@ void ExprEngine::ProcessInitializer(const CFGInitializer
CFGInit,
PostInitializer PP(BMI, FieldLoc.getAsRegion(), stackFrame);
evalBind(Tmp, Init, Pred, FieldLoc, InitVal, /*isInit=*/true, &PP);
}
+ } else if (BMI->isBaseInitializer() &&
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// Refer issue 70464 for more details.
+//
+// When the base class does not have a declared constructor, the base
+// initializer in the constructor of the derived class should use the given
+// initializer list to finish the initialization of the base class.
+//
https://github.com/Snape3058 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
>From fa7f1d1a862d584d42e9f4a44660f6f61501b150 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ella Ma
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 18:41:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [analyzer] Fix uninitialized base class with initializer list
when c
https://github.com/Snape3058 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70792
When ctor is not declared in the base class, initializing the base class with
the initializer list will not trigger a proper assignment of the base region,
as a CXXConstructExpr doing that is not available in
Author: Ella Ma
Date: 2023-07-03T16:13:47+08:00
New Revision: 1bd2d335b649f2e09d7e4bdd0b92c78489ded022
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1bd2d335b649f2e09d7e4bdd0b92c78489ded022
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1bd2d335b649f2e09d7e4bdd0b92c78489ded022.diff
LOG:
Author: Ella Ma
Date: 2022-07-14T22:00:38+08:00
New Revision: 32fe1a4be95c90da9a24d63a097429ec7c3bbfba
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32fe1a4be95c90da9a24d63a097429ec7c3bbfba
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32fe1a4be95c90da9a24d63a097429ec7c3bbfba.diff
LOG:
Author: Ella Ma
Date: 2022-03-22T10:28:42+08:00
New Revision: 9f90254286dc6ec9be39648200712dfe2e4b1fda
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9f90254286dc6ec9be39648200712dfe2e4b1fda
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9f90254286dc6ec9be39648200712dfe2e4b1fda.diff
LOG:
28 matches
Mail list logo
